I have been using Kurt Aland’s Synopsis of the Four Gospels for a while now and I have gotten the feel of it. I have found it of great value in doing micro-level work, such as word and phrase comparisons/additions/omissions of the Greek and examination of secondary and extra-gospel parallels, and in macro-level work like understanding how the other Synoptic writers followed or separated from Mark in the broader picture of the individual Synoptics, or following the flow of each individual Synoptic gospel.
I am unsure if this is using the Synopsis to its fullest. I do not know exactly what I am trying to put my finger on here, but maybe this is a good question to begin with: What are some more effective ways to use Aland’s Synopsis than the micro- and macro-level examples I mentioned? How do you tend to use it in your gospels studies?
the archives near Emmaus 
One way to make the synopsis more effective is to take out your colored pencils and color the similarities and differences so they are more visual distinct.
Stephen,
Thanks for the tip. I can definitely see the benefit in doing what you’ve recommended. I’m glad I have three Synopses to practice on! 🙂
Check out Scot McKnights book on Introducing the Synoptic Gospels, he’s got a color system in there and helps understand the synoptic better – but I think basically micro level work is what it is for.
Brian,
Thanks for the recommendation. I’ll be sure to check it out.
John,
I saw it at Powell’s for like $5!
Brian,
No way! Did you get it?
No, I left it for you. Gospels section, bottom shelf. I was there Saturday. I assume it is there still.