I was reading an author this morning that made a few statements regarding the “objective truth” of Scripture. While I understand what he is trying to say it made me wonder about the use of that terminology. When I think of the canonical gospels I don’t think of (a) objectivity nor do I think of (b) erroneous. I think of truthful subjectivity. In other words Scripture definitely has an angle, a lens, and a narrative through which it tells the story of the world and individual authors within the canon even more so. Shouldn’t we speak of Scripture as being subjective yet truthful?