As a theological discipline dogmatics is the scientific self-examination of the Christian Church with respect to the content of its distinctive talk about God.[1]
It is very easy for a Christian community to fall under the illusion that it exists and works as the result of complete human endeavour. The church, in this frame of reference, is the sole result of people’s hard work and achievement and it would seem as if God is shunted off to the side awaiting the completion of the building in order that he might be invited in as the special guest. The people can be heard to proclaim, “Look what we did for God in Jesus’ name!”
However, it does not take much to see that Scripture reminds us that the church, as it is known in this modern era, is the sole result of God’s work in Jesus Christ and is brought forth by the Holy Spirit. In the same way God elected Israel to be his agent of redemption in the world, so to the church is elected in Christ. It is brought forth, established and sustained in Him by the Holy Spirit. There is not a congregation, big or small, that is not founded in Christ.
As a continuing (and perhaps continual) work of the Holy Spirit, if we began in Christ why do we not continue? Why do we so easily push God to the side and try to prove ourselves to Him? It is not that we should do nothing. No. This would be slothfulness. Rather, everything we undertake in Jesus name is our response to His faithfulness in Christ.
[1] Karl Barth et al., Church Dogmatics, Volume I The Doctrine of the Word of God, Part 1 (2d ed.; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2004), 3.
Will you be working through the Dogmatics like some other bloggers are doing this year?
Great post Mark!
Thanks Joshua
Brian – I would like to but if I say yes, I won’t. I’ll see how I go. I am writing as I read (I have read them before) as a means of trying to understand what Barth is saying.
@Mark: I won’t press you into a yes, but it would be neat. I could read Barth’s Dogmatics vicariously through you!
@BRian HAHAHA Someone said that to me yesterday. I am no Barth expert but I have studied him quite a bit as an undergrad. He’s different and pastoral so I thought I’d have a conversation with him!
I know lots of people are trying to read through the Dogs at present and maybe the dialogue will help. But NO, I am not read through them all 😉
@Mark – I completely agree about the pastoral nature of Barth’s theology. Well worth conversing if you’re interested in a deeply theological discussion about pastoral ministry. So, even if you don’t read through all of the Dogmatics (does anyone actually survive to the end?), I’ll be interested in seeing what you think along the way.
Thanks Marc I know of three (Ben Myers being one) people one who has done it several times and the other who did it in a year!
I am nervous about posting my thoughts but figure, what the heck!